"Sir, your not part of the solution. Like ISIS, your part of the problem and another hate preacher! When are you going to stop hating?"
For those of you who are feeling confused by now and are probably asking "What are you talking about Khalid?!!!!", I offer the following clarification.
In this broadcast and while he is celebrating wining a court case against his Australian muslim citizen, Tawhidi suddenly starts mocking Umar Ibn Al Khattab, the second khalif of Islam who perished more than 1400 years ago!!!! See minutes 6:00 to 6:12.
Tawhidi presents himself as an enlightened Shi'ite Muslim advocating tolerance and the urgent need for reforming an expired Sharia Law. But like the rest of Shi'ite Muslims, Tawhidi also devotes his life to prove that Imam Ali should have been elected as the first and the Godly successor of prophet Mohamed, may peace and blessing of Allah be upon him. That's because, in reality, Imam Ali ended up being elected as the fourth Khalif. As a result and like the rest of Shi'ite Muslims, Tawhidi devotes his life to hating the first three elected Khalifs and to hating the vast majority of the early Muslims who more than 1400 years ago preferred the first three Khalifs over Imam Ali.
He has learned to hate Umar in the traditional Shi'ite school of thought that teaches salvation being in hating the first three Khalifs of Islam and hating the vast majority of the remaining 120,000 companions of the prophet Mohamed, may peace and blessing of Allah be upon him.
In this broadcast, Tawhidi starts off correctly by blaming his challenger for turning a political difference in opinion into an unjustified hate. The irony is that Tawhidi and Shi'ite school of thought have done the same mistake for over the past 1000 years by hating the first three Khalifs due to political disputes. Unfortunately, the hate is so deeply seated in the Shi'ite conscious and has turned into a an Oedipus that calls for revenge from those who didn't side with Imam Ali! Knowing that its impossible to revenge from those who perished more than 1400 years ago, what could shi'ite Muslims possibly mean by their calls for revenge and whom they intend to revenge from?!. Isn't safe to assume that they mean to revenge from the existing Sunni community who recognise the legitimacy of the first three Khalifs?
This is embarrassingly insane, knowing that Sunni Muslims equally love and highly respect Imam Ali, if not more, than the first three Khalifs?
In Australia, Tawhidi advocates denouncing the traditional Shi'ite school of thought and an expired Sharia Law that requires urgent revision. He claims championing the truth and nothing but the truth. He believes he is an unapologetic reformist of both Shiaa and Sunni Islam school of thoughts. He tries to prove it by criticising these two schools of thought, although his path meets with any non-Muslim far right group in directing vast majority of his criticisms towards the fastest growing religion in the world (Sunni Islam). What a coincidence!
But his attack today on Umar, the 1400 years old 2nd Khalif of Islam, is driven from the core hateful teachings of the traditional Shi'ite scholars and the core hateful teachings of the traditional Shi'ite school of thought that he pretends denouncing!
Tawhidi advocates being free from dark age teachings of shi'ite Islam taught by the Shi'ite clerks, but he is not. Obviously, he is still a victim of those hate mongering teachings that are engraved and deeply seated in his mind. He says something and does another!
Today I was peacefully watching his broadcast until I heard him mockingly mentioning Umar Ibn Al Khattab. I was initially shocked but then I remembered that as a Shi'ite Muslim, Tawhidi considers Imam Ali, the fourth Khalif, an impeccable and holy Muslim. On the other hand, he considers Umar a tyrant, aggressor and a hypocrite. But historically, Imam Ali served loyally under the Khalif Umar and Imam Ali also agreed to his daughter's marriage to Khalif Umar. But, Tawhidi's Oedipus mind continues to ignore historical facts and blindly mocks Umar as his shi'ite clerks have ignorantly done over the last 1000 years. Seems to me, Tawhidi and his enlightened clerics know something that their impeccable Imam Ali didn't know!
Tawhidi is still a prisoner of the dark age and hateful teachings of the traditional Shi'ite school of thought. Nevermind what Tawhidi says in words about tolerance, his actions and beliefs prove that he still follows the hateful dogma taught by Shi'ite hate preachers such as the Shirazi.
Tawhidi mocked Umar whom Sophronius, the patriarch of Jerusalem in 630s, conditionally agreed to surrender Jerusalem to. History tells how Umar agreed to Sophronius's condition and travelled thousand of kilometres from Medinah, capital of Islamic empire, to peacefully take over Jerusalem's key from Sophronius.
Interestingly, history also tells that Umar sat on this historical journey after consulting his advisers in Medinah. While some warned him about the risks associated with this adventure, others such as Imam Ali encouraged him to go ahead with it. Umar accepted Imam Ali's advice but before leaving to Jerusalem, Umar wisely deputed Imam Ali to act in his absence as his successor in the capital of Islam.
Would Umar choose Imam Ali as his successor if they were not in good terms, as claimed by Shi'ite scholars?!
Don't these historical facts prove that harmony, trust and respect were bonding Umar and Imam Ali and not hate as Tawhidi and other Shi'ite clerics advocate?!
It's obvious that the relationship between Umar and Ali was strong and trust full. Yet, shi'ite clerics teach that they were enemies! When intellectual shi'ite Muslims refer to Imam Ali's actions and question the contradictory hateful teachings that can't historically hold water, the hate mongering Shi'ite scholars justify:
"Imam Ali was faking and performing Taqqiyyah when he collaborated with the first three Khalifs and when he agreed to his daughter's marriage to the second Khalif that he hated!!!." This is embarrassing, historically squint and insulting to Imam Ali who was known for his unprecedented bravery.
I am not surprised to hear such a vulgar justification from most of Shi'ite clerics, who act more like political opponents rather than pious Muslims. But I am surprised that Tawhidi, who claims reform and denounces hate, still follows such hateful fallacies and literatures! It's obvious that Tawhidi is still very much loyal to such hateful fallacies taught in the school he claims to be fighting to reform.
Tawhidi is very selective in denouncing hateful Shi'ite literature. He only denounces what western critics denounce. He is no where close to the enlightened and pious Shi'ite reformists such as Ahmed Al Katib, who genuinely examines and screens the entire Shi'ite literature. Unlike Tawhidi, Al Katib no longer hates the first three Khalifs but believes Imam Ali would have made a better first Khalif than Abu Baker, may Allah bless them all.
In fact, important Sunni literatures are full of references to pious and trust worthy Shi'ite Muslims. Sunni Islam school is matured enough to differentiate between pious Shi'ite Muslims, such as Ahmed Al Katib, and radical shi'ite Muslims such as Tawhidi. This balanced and tolerant Sunni school methodology is clearly stated in Mizan Al Etidal for Imam Al Dhahabi.
I wonder, is it wrong to doubt if Tawhidi has truly abandoned the teaching of Shirazi?
Is it wrong to say that Tawhidi is performing Taqqiyyah to attack the fast growing Sunni Islam in Australia and west?
Is it wrong to say that Tawhidi is impressing the Australian Islamophobs to secure his living?
What if Tawhidi is a genuine reformist, yet young and lacking experience?
In any case, for the time being, he remains to be part of the problem and not the solution.
I am looking forward to the day we celebrate Tawhidi's full independence. When he frees himself from hate and adopts a methodology that is based on research and facts, making conclusions as a results of independent analysis, verification and evaluation as called for in Quran chapter 39 verses 17 and 18 that says:
"So give good tidings to My servants. Who listen to speech and follow the best of it. Those are the ones Allah has guided, and those are people of understanding."
I pray to Allah to grant him and his loved ones the best of this life and the life after.
https://www.facebook.com/theimamofpeace/videos/483220985680889/
